Modular Soft Robots (MSRs)
Suggested Readings
[2020, Review] Modular Soft Robotics: Modular Units, Connection Mechanisms, and Applications (pdf)
[2007] Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems. Challenges and Opportunities for the Future
[2020, Thesis] A New Paradigm in Reconfigurable Robotics
[2012, Review] A Modular Approach to Soft Robots (Onal, Rus)
Nonlinear Modeling and Docking Tests of a Soft Modular Robot
Vacuum‐Powered Soft Pneumatic Twisting Actuators to Empower New Capabilities for Soft Robots
Modular assembly of soft deployable structures and robots
[Vacuubes] A Vacuum-Based Bonding Mechanism for Modular Robotics
Additional:
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Self-reconfiguring_modular_robot#
Overview of Modular Soft Robots
Pros
+ Versatility
+ Robustness - modular upgrades & repairs
+ Low cost for manufacturing & maintenance
+ Adaptability to changing task & environments
+ Ease of repair by changing only damaged modules
+ Ease of transport & storage (e.g Space Launches)
+ Scalable
+ A small set of modules can enable infinite morphologies
Cons
- Complex and time-consuming to design
- Higher cost than application-specific soft robots
- Still in their infancy
- Couplings are most critical
- Couplings require custom design
- Choice of couplings still very limited.
- More complex to control than app-specific SRs
- Performance tradeoffs compared to nonmodular
Ful list of Pros & Cons of modular designs in the Modularity Resource Guide.
Capabilities
- Adaptation to new Tasks and Environments
- Self Assembly
- Self Repair
- Reconfigurability
- Reusability of modules
- Fit into confined spaces
- High packing density when disassembled
Applications
- Medical, Surgical, Implantable
- Home assistance (a modular chain manipulator)
- Physical representation of virtual objects
- Temporary housing structures beyond earth
- Terrain exploration
- Search and Rescue
- Minimally invasive surgery
- Safe human-robot interaction
Levels of Configurability
Configurable [48-67]
The parts are designed for a specific configuration or application
Reconfigurable [47,68-87]
Capable of repeated structural or functional transformations.
Consist of homogeneous or heterogeneous units
Self-Reconfigurable [88,89]
Capable to achieving various morphologies automatically.
Architecture Types
Reconfigurable robots are classified into three types by the geometric arrangements of their units, Some are hybrids.
Mobile Architecture
The individual modules are mobile and can attach individually
+ Modules can be physically disconnected but operate
as a single unit together.
+ Enables applications like self assembly and swarms.
- Modules are complex and expensive
Lattice Architecture
Modules are arranged and connected in some regular, 2D or 3D pattern, such as a simple cubic or hexagonal grid
+ Control & Motion can be executed in parallel
+ Easily scaled
- Movies can only be at discrete locations on the lattice
Chain Architecture
The modules connect to each other as a chain topology. The underlying structure is serial.
+ Folding is possible
+ Versatile in locomotion patterns
+ Connectable in 2D or 3D patterns
- Computationally demanding
- Difficult to control
Coupling Mechanisms & Interconnects
The connection mechanism between modules is the most critical part for modular systems with physically-connected modules. They determines factors such as range of motion, capabilities, efficiency, and overall size of a modular robot. A variety of connection types are possible between modules, each with its oen pros and cons, and there is not one best solution.
-
Desirable Properties
-
Small Size
-
High Mechanical Strength under all loading scenarios
-
Information Transmission Capability
-
Power Transmission Capability
-
Reversibility & Repeatability
-
Ease & Speed of connection / disconnection
-
Self-Alignment
-
Very low or no power consumption
-
Orientation invariance & Genderlessness
-
Unilateral instead of bilateral actuation
-
Compliant rather than rigid
-
Low cost
-
Mechanical
Pros
+ Most common with high diversity
+ High reliability
+ Alignment precision
+ Self-alignment possible
+ High connection strength
Cons
- Typically large and bulky
- Difficult to detach
Rigid
Soft
+ Maintain compliance of the soft robot
- Can't withstand high pressures or forces
- Virtually no examples in the literature
- Fully custom made
Bystable
Magnetic
Pros
+ Easy attachment
+ Easy manual detashment
+ Self aligning
+ Conductive
+ Genderless & Orientation Invariant
Cons
- Reduce compliance of robot
Permanent Magnets
+ No power required
+ Very compact
+ Attachment to/of other metal parts possible
+ Easily combined with other actuators (Motors, SMA)
+ Suitable for submerged applications
- Disconnect requires extra actuation
- Misalignment or disconnection under load
Magnet with hole
Multiple Magnets
Placeholder
Placeholder
Placeholder
Electromagnets
+ Auto Connect & Disconnect possible
- Continuous power consumption during hold
- Sufficient space required
Electropermanent Magnet
+ Low power; used only for state change
+ Maintain state without power
- Expensive
- Custom fabrication required
Adhesive
Pros
+ Minimum spacing requirements
+ High connection strength
+ Low complexity
+ Genderless & orientation invariant
Cons
- slow connection & disconnection
- accurate alignment needed
Self-soldering
+ Low melt point at 62°C for Field's Alloy
+ Easily manufacturable by PCB fabricators
+ Small & Lightweight (2g, 3mm thick)
+ Programmable / Reversable
+ Conductive
- Not compliant, but can be made with flex PCBs
- Unsuitable for underwater applications
- Slow - 10s heating; 30s cooling
- Prone to corrosion
- Low durability (100+ cycles before failure)
Self-Soldering
Active Freeze (via peltier devices)
+ Low melt point at 62°C for Field's Alloy
+ Easily manufacturable by PCB fabricators
+ Small & Lightweight (2g, 3mm thick)
+ Programmable / Reversable
+ Conductive
- Not compliant, but can be made with flex PCBs
- Unsuitable for underwater applications
- Slow - 10s heating; 30s cooling
- Prone to corrosion
- Low durability (100+ cycles before failure)
Hot-melt Adhesives / hot glue (HMAs) [135]
+ Connection & Disconnection possible
+ Nonsticky, viscoelastic solid at 25◦C
+ Heating/Cooling can be done locally or globally
- Slow
- Heating Mechanism required
- HMA Applica
- Cooling through natural heat dissipation, but active cooling is possible.
-
At room temperature (Tr around 25◦C), the material is an viscoelastic solid with no adhesiveness, thus unable to form new bonds. But existing connections are maintained with high bonding strength.
-
At softening-point temperatures Ts, the material starts to become visco-plastic and adhesive. The bond is drastically weakened, and maintain an established connection becomes difficult.
-
At melting point temperature Tm (generally 150◦C), the the material transforms into a low-viscosity fluid.
NOTE: Ts and Tm vary depending on the ingredients of HMAs, and they are generally temperature ranges.
Electrostatic Adhesion [136]
+ Connection & Disconnection possible
- High voltage required
Glue / Silicone / Tape
+ Leakproof
+ No additional structures needed
+ Easy to apply
+ Dovetail joints can increase bonding area
[83]
- Difficult or impossible to disconnect
- Compliance is maintained
- Bonding strength proportional to bonded area
Silicone Adhesion
Dovetail Joints
Arthrobots
Pneumatic (Vacuum)
Pros
+ Easy connection and disconnection
+ Automatic alignment possible
+ High connection strength
+ Low complexity
+ Can use the robot's pneumatic driver
Cons
- accurate alignment needed for good connection
- some designs prone to misalignment
- extra pump may be required
- nonconductive
Vacuubes